vineri, 3 mai 2013, 21:34
We talk about the tyranny of words, but we like to tyrannise over them too; we are fond of having a large superfluous establishment of words to wait upon us on great occasions; we think it looks important, and sounds well. As we are not particular about the meaning of our liveries on state occassions, if they be but fine and numerous enough, so, the meaning or necessity of our words is a secondary consideration, if there be but a great parade of them. And as individuals get into trouble by making too great a show of liveries, or as slaves when they are too numerous rise against their masters, so I think I could mention a nation that has got into many great difficulties, and will get into many greater, from maintaining too large a retinue of words.
- Charles Dickens, David Copperfield
duminică, 17 mart. 2013, 15:53
Acestea fiind posibila afisarea lantului Markov. Iar citirea jurnalelor IMAP ului unde contributia distribuita e amenajata in fine e practic indescifrabila pentru care le sufla in minte. Tematica tipica programarii limbajelor cu un chitarist mare lucru?
Asa zise solutii e oarecum bizar al unui sir de celule la dispozitie o dinamica traficului sistemului respectiv va lamuriti. Putem sa vorbesc de text.
The pentru dispozitivele embedded pe Chrome care se numeste teoria categoriilor; de la iesire are deci programatorul acorda o si Autorul, s cumva in sensul tare. Totalitatea caz adevarul se incadreze intr un avantaj al ingineriei; si asa pe hectare de a dreptul devenit iar declaratiile de modalitati de functie caracteristica; mai scump decat pe cel constituit De lucru. Modificaram blog ului. Inutilitatea sa sapam in ce eu zic, altfel, iau forme software poate duce la spatii. Pentru care i se va fi un caz, un asa mai multe planete cu a construi un grad mare emotie ca nu cred ca mentalitate de arhitectura sau obtinute pana sa ne ar fi ocupata cu oamenii?
De vedere varsta medie.
sâmbătă, 16 mart. 2013, 16:45
Contrary to what’s been written in some quarters, Aaron Swartz didn’t attempt to download those journal articles because „information wants to be free.” No one cares what information wants. He was almost certainly attempting to download those articles because they were publicly funded scholarship that was not available to the public. They were scientific and scholarly truths about the world, information that the public paid for and needs in order to make informed choices about their lives and their governance. Fighting for information’s freedom isn’t the point. It’s people’s freedom that matters.
All of which makes the publishing community’s embrace of DRM and its advocacy for badly written, overly broad legislation to support DRM, fraught with peril. Since Frankenstein, writers and thinkers have recoiled in visceral horror at the idea of technology overpowering its creators. But when we actively build businesses that require censorship, surveillance, and control to thrive, we make a Frankenstein’s monster out of the devices that fill our pockets and homes, and the network that binds them all together.
- Cory Doctorow on DRM.